Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:53:22 +0200
From: Sebastian Lara <[email protected]>

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING IS A NON EDITED MACHINE TRANSLATION FROM THE ORIGINAL IN SPANISH

Hello colleagues:

I find that the proposal doesn't assume fully that of Samana mainly the exhibition of Sam 90% info 10% tech. What it worries me is how to assume the diversity of social movements to leave the intellectual posture, as those that signals J.I. in Nica, and the different answers that are believed (case of U. of Mexico).
It is necessary to recover elements that you advanced in previous debates and to incorporate them, Ethics of the Diversity, Areas Temporarily Autonomous (TAZ), and some other that would allow to come closer from two angles to what in general We consider as impact (for that that signals M.M. and Raisa). On the one hand the rigid of a methodology that plays those fear and on the other the social processes that dance to their own one rhythm. This way we will be able to be but holistic.
I also find that the processes that are given, the U. of Mexico for example, and the work of the VC at this point specifies of those recommendations for the calendar are not two different things but one that would serve us guide overalls, for what we could call in a future positive social Impact (ISP).

Acid Bye.
Sebastian Lara

http://funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/production/c4/0010.html
Last modified: 16/09/1999