Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:02:38 -0400
From: Sebastian LARA <[email protected]>

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING IS A NON EDITED MACHINE TRANSLATION FROM THE ORIGINAL IN SPANISH

THIS MESSAGE REPLIES TO Kemly Camacho, Re: MISTICA-EN: Democ.: The Internet and the civil society, 24/01/2000.

Aupa Colleagues:

The restlessness of Kemly on how or how much a technology influences I believe that it should be seen from two points of view at least. To the margin that the work (like punishment of the god of the Christian) of for if it individualizes and it also makes worse / the competitiveness goes

. The first one is that any mediation type in the communications like the TV or better the telephone has changed the habits of the communications and it has created certain communication code, kind of a jargon that people that talks on the phone spread to respect. Otherwise with the TV it is individualized and believe problems of on known in the family nuclei where every time it is spoken less and at more TV is looked.

Another point of view is that to take out bigger profit to the same technology it is necessary the communication, just as it would be the case of GNU-Linux.

Finally I believe that what is changing in fact is the work form, like I point out at the beginning it was competitive and now it spreads to be collaborative, and you begins to speak of emotional intelligence, of nets, women like more efficient directors, etc. to see: http://www.fastcompany.com/online/29/paranoia.html

http://funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/production/c4/0109.html
Last modified: 28/01/2000