Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 13:23:55 -0400
From: Raisa U. Minardi <[email protected]>

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING IS A NON EDITED MACHINE TRANSLATION FROM THE ORIGINAL IN SPANISH

Hello:

Absolutely in accordance with what M. outlines Menou:

> The notion of a positive social impact is inadequate if not you
> it incorporates the negative impact and the fight against this negative impact.
> With the economic forces that at the moment are playing a paper of
> maxi concentration, the one predicts it is a lot but that of a social impact
> negative that that of a positive social impact.

Without spirits of reissuing to the apocalyptic ones, certainly, in the stage pre-samana pronounces me about the necessity of including in the discussions the reflection on what the theoretical ones have called the economy of those communications, so near to what outlines MM and closely linked with the politicians of communications and the environment regulatory / no regulatory.

It seems still convenient, because the tendencies and the presage (with handle in partial diagnoses) they are every time but somber. Memory that in Samana the group that discussed socially on the " axis " populations discriminated against, also referred to the topic.

I believe that in principle he/she would be necessary to respond as in that spheres and to which even this negative social impact it is manifested. The AP could be a channel...

On the other hand that interesting to read the I finish work that Jos� offers us Silvio (thank you to put it first here), in the context of the call that he/she makes the coordination to participate. A quarry also for the AP...

http://www.funredes.org/mistica/castellano/ciberoteca/participantes/docuparti/doc35.html

Greetings,

Raisa

http://funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/production/c4/0009.html
Last modified: 15/09/1999