I am hearing three main voices at the moment - one is
about different technology and running the discussion
unmoderated and I think misses the point; one is
looking for ways to support moderation at least to
allow the discussion to continue; and one suggests
that Mistica has lived its natural life and should now
be allowed to die with dignity.

Daniel, when you started the project how long did you
expect it to last? Was there any sense of "life span"
at the beginning of Mistica? Apart from simply
"being", which I would argue is valuable in itself,
has Mistica done everything it set out to do, or are
there goals it still has not reached?

(I think true multi-lingualism/multi-culturalism
hasn't been reached yet - mea maxima culpa )

Can we (Mistica) try to find a new vision, new
direction, from the unreached objectives??
And if we can't find that vision and direction then
the third voice is correct and Mistica should stop.
But in that case the only thing more powerful than
Funredes on the subject of "what will happen to
Mistica" is every single one of the current
Mistic@s speaking together, so I believe that
Funredes has the last word, and if Mistica stops,
it stops as itself, taking its name with it.

Abrazos
Deirdre
Nearby lun 29 ene 2007 11:40:15 AST